IBRAHIM v. WARDEN et al
| YUSUF IBRAHIM |
| WARDEN, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and STATE OF NEW JERSEY |
| 2:2023cv04072 |
| July 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| John Michael Vazquez |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER directing the Clerk of the Court to ADMINISTRATIVELY TERMINATE this matter. Petitioner has thirty (30) days from the date of entry of this Order to pay the filing fee or submit a complete in forma pauperis application on the proper form. Upon receipt of a writing from Petitioner stating that he wishes to reopen this case, and either a complete in forma pauperis application on the proper form or payment of the filing fee within the time allotted by this Court, the Clerk will be directed to reopenthis case. The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order and a blank formDNJ-Pro Se-007-B-(Rev. 09/09) upon Petitioner by regular U.S. mail. Signed by Judge John Michael Vazquez on 8/24/2023. (Notice of Mail) (dam)
|
| Filing 2 Letter from Petitioner YUSUF IBRAHIM regarding Private Investigator. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit re NJ Dept of Corrections Request for Attorney, #2 Envelope)(dam) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by YUSUF IBRAHIM. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Exhibits, #3 Envelope)(pnm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
