HOUCK v. EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES, INC. et al
| WILLIAM HOUCK |
| EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES, INC., JOSEPH MASTRANGELO, RANDALL GONZALE and NATHAN KROEKER |
| 2:2023cv04113 |
| August 1, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Michael A Hammer |
| Julien Xavier Neals |
| Securities/Commodities |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Notice of Request by Pro Hac Vice Charles C. Bridge to receive Notices of Electronic Filings. ( Pro Hac Vice fee $ 150 receipt number ANJDC-14649763.) (MARTENS, MATTHEW) |
| Filing 9 Notice of Request by Pro Hac Vice Timothy Perla to receive Notices of Electronic Filings. ( Pro Hac Vice fee $ 150 receipt number ANJDC-14649543.) (MARTENS, MATTHEW) |
| Pro Hac Vice counsel, TIMOTHY PERLA and CHARLES C. BRIDGE, have been added to receive Notices of Electronic Filing. Pursuant to L.Civ.R. 101.1, only local counsel are entitled to sign and file papers, enter appearances and receive payments on judgments, decrees or orders. (dam) |
Filing 8
ORDER granting #5 Defendants' Application for the Pro Hac Vice Admission as to TIMOTHY PERLA and CHARLES C. BRIDGE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer on 9/5/2023. (dam)
|
|
Filing 7
STIPULATION and ORDER that Defendants accept service of the Complaint. Defendants shall not be required to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. Within fourteen (14) days following entry of an order by the Court pursuant to the PSLRA selecting the Lead Plaintiff and appointing Lead Counsel, Defendants' counsel and Lead Counsel shall confer and submit a proposed schedule for the filing of an amended complaint and Defendants' response thereto. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer on 9/5/2023. (dam)
|
| Filing 6 STIPULATION (Joint) Regarding Service and Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead by EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES, INC., RANDALL GONZALE, NATHAN KROEKER, JOSEPH MASTRANGELO. (MARTENS, MATTHEW) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Timothy Perla and Charles C. Bridge by EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES, INC., RANDALL GONZALE, NATHAN KROEKER, JOSEPH MASTRANGELO. (Attachments: #1 Certification of Matthew T. Martens in Support of Motion, #2 Certification of Timothy Perla in Support of Motion, #3 Certification of Charles C. Bridge in Support of Motion, #4 Text of Proposed Order, #5 Certificate of Service)(MARTENS, MATTHEW) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES, INC.. (MARTENS, MATTHEW) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by MATTHEW T. MARTENS on behalf of EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES, INC., RANDALL GONZALE, NATHAN KROEKER, JOSEPH MASTRANGELO (MARTENS, MATTHEW) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES, INC., RANDALL GONZALE, NATHAN KROEKER, JOSEPH MASTRANGELO. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (sm) |
| Notice of Judicial Preferences. #Click here for the Judge's Individual Procedure Requirements. (kd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES, INC., RANDALL GONZALE, NATHAN KROEKER, JOSEPH MASTRANGELO ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-14497485) with JURY DEMAND, filed by WILLIAM HOUCK. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A)(COOPER, KEVIN) |
| Case assigned to Judge Julien Xavier Neals and Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer. (jr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
