HAY v. 3LAB, INC. et al
| ALEXEI HAY |
| 3LAB, INC. and DOES 1-10, inclusive |
| 2:2023cv04198 |
| August 4, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Andre M Espinosa |
| Julien Xavier Neals |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by ALEXEI HAY. 3LAB, INC. waiver sent on 8/9/2023, answer due 10/10/2023. (HIGBEE, MELISSA) |
| Notice of Judicial Preferences. #Click here for the Judge's Individual Procedure Requirements. (kd) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to 3LAB, INC. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (sm) |
| Filing 3 AO121 Copyright Form filed. (Attachments: #1 Complaint and Exhibits) (sm) |
| Case assigned to Judge Julien Xavier Neals and Magistrate Judge Andre M. Espinosa. (jr) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by ALEXEI HAY. (HIGBEE, MELISSA) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 3LAB, INC., DOES 1-10, inclusive ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-14506626) with JURY DEMAND, filed by ALEXEI HAY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-C, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Report on the Filing of an Action Regarding a Copyright)(HIGBEE, MELISSA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
