SINGH v. JAAP TRUCKING INC et al
| HARPREET SINGH |
| JAAP TRUCKING INC, SSM FREIGHT LLC and KULDEEP SINGH |
| 2:2023cv06645 |
| August 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Katharine S Hayden |
| Leda D Wettre |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by TIFFANY TROY on behalf of HARPREET SINGH (TROY, TIFFANY) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to JAAP TRUCKING INC, KULDEEP SINGH, SSM FREIGHT LLC. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (lag, ) |
| Case assigned to Judge Katharine S. Hayden and Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre. (jr) |
| Filing 2 Request for Summons to be Issued by HARPREET SINGH as to JAAP TRUCKING INC, KULDEEP SINGH, SSM FREIGHT LLC. (SCHWEITZER, AARON) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JAAP TRUCKING INC, KULDEEP SINGH, SSM FREIGHT LLC ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-14555408) with JURY DEMAND, filed by HARPREET SINGH. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 01 Document Preservation Demand, #2 Exhibit 02 Notice of Lien and Assignment, #3 Exhibit 03 Notice that Retaliation is Illegal under FLSA and NJWHL, #4 Exhibit 04 Consent to Become Party Plaintiff, #5 Civil Cover Sheet 05 Civil Cover Sheet /gd)(SCHWEITZER, AARON) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
