HAWKINS v. BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY et al
VERA HAWKINS |
BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY, C.R. BARD, INC. and BARD ACCESS SYSTEMS, INC. |
2:2023cv09322 |
August 24, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Madeline Cox Arleo |
Cathy L Waldor |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Order of MDL Panel transferring case to the District of Arizona (IN RE: BARD IMPLANTED PORT CATHETERPRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION - assigned to Judge David G. Campbell. (krg, ) |
Case extracted via ECF to District of Arizona. (krg, ) |
Case transferred from New Jersey has been opened in DISTRICT OF ARIZONA as case 2:23-cv-02020, filed 09/26/2023. (krg, ) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to BARD ACCESS SYSTEMS, INC., BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY, C.R. BARD, INC.. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (lag, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BARD ACCESS SYSTEMS, INC., BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY, C.R. BARD, INC. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-14576211) with JURY DEMAND, filed by VERA HAWKINS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(YOUNG, DENA) |
Case assigned to Judge Madeline Cox Arleo and Magistrate Judge Cathy L. Waldor. (jr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.