ATR PAPER INC. v. BANGKIT (U.S.A.), INC. et al
ATR PAPER INC. |
BANGKIT (U.S.A.), INC. doing business as BAZIC PRODUCTS, RICHMOND VAN and DOES 1-5 |
BANGKIT (U.S.A.), INC. |
ARELIS TORRES ROSADO |
2:2023cv12696 |
August 29, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Edward S Kiel |
Brian R Martinotti |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 Corporate Disclosure Statement by BANGKIT (U.S.A.), INC., RICHMOND VAN. (GRIEP, SETH) |
Filing 12 Defendants ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND and, COUNTERCLAIM against ATR PAPER INC., Arelis Torres Rosado by RICHMOND VAN, BANGKIT (U.S.A.), INC..(GRIEP, SETH) |
Filing 11 LETTER ORDER: A telephonic initial scheduling conference shall be held on November 20, 2023 at 9:45 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel. The dial in number is 1-973-437-5535 and the phone conference ID is 682 945 91#. The parties shall file a proposed joint discovery plan no later than three business days before the scheduled initial conference. The Court's form joint discovery plan can be found # here. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel on 10/19/2023. (sms) |
Filing 10 STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending Time for Defendants to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint until October 20, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel on 10/10/2023. (qa, ) |
Answer Due Deadline Update - The document #9 Stipulation filed by BANGKIT (U.S.A.), INC., RICHMOND VAN submitted by RICHMOND VAN, BANGKIT (U.S.A.), INC. has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 10/20/2023. (qa, ) |
Filing 9 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer by BANGKIT (U.S.A.), INC., RICHMOND VAN. (GRIEP, SETH) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by SETH DAVID GRIEP on behalf of BANGKIT (U.S.A.), INC., RICHMOND VAN (GRIEP, SETH) |
Filing 7 ORDER granting the Application for Extension of Time to Answer, Move, or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel on 9/19/2023. (qa, ) |
Clerk`s Text Order - The document #6 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by RICHMOND VAN, BANGKIT (U.S.A.), INC. has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 10/6/2023. (qa, ) |
Filing 6 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer Attorney KAROL CORBIN WALKER for BANGKIT (U.S.A.), INC.,KAROL CORBIN WALKER for DOES 1-5,KAROL CORBIN WALKER for RICHMOND VAN added. (WALKER, KAROL) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by KAROL CORBIN WALKER on behalf of All Defendants (WALKER, KAROL) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by ATR PAPER INC.. BANGKIT (U.S.A.), INC. served on 8/31/2023, answer due 9/21/2023; RICHMOND VAN served on 8/31/2023, answer due 9/21/2023. (BERKOWITZ, MARK) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to BANGKIT (U.S.A.), INC., RICHMOND VAN. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (qa, ) |
Case Assigned to Judge Brian R. Martinotti and Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel. (ak, ) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by ATR PAPER INC.. (BERKOWITZ, MARK) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BANGKIT (U.S.A.), INC., DOES 1-5, RICHMOND VAN ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-14608390) with JURY DEMAND, filed by ATR PAPER INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(BERKOWITZ, MARK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.