LATTI v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION
| JACQUELINE LATTI |
| COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, JOHN DOES 1-5 and ABC CORP. 1-5 |
| 2:2023cv18539 |
| September 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Jose R Almonte |
| Madeline Cox Arleo |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Transmittal Letter for remanded case to Bergen County Justice Center10 Main StreetHackensack, NJ 07601 State No: BER-L-3535-23. Mailed certified copy of the Order remanding case. (wh) |
Filing 8
STIPULATION AND ORDER Capping the Amount in Controversy and Remanding the Matter to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Bergen Vicinage. The amount in controversy is hereby capped and shall not exceed the sum or value of $75,000.00. The United States District Court no longer possesses subject matter jurisdiction over this matter. The above captioned matter is hereby REMANDED to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Bergen Vicinage, No. BER-L-3535-23. Signed by Judge Madeline Cox Arleo on 10/26/2023. (wh)
|
| ***Civil Case Terminated per #8 STIPULATION AND ORDER. (wh) |
|
Filing 7
TEXT ORDER: In light of the parties proposed order to cap the amount in controversy and remand this action to State Court (ECF No. #6 ), the initial scheduling conference set for October 31, 2023 is canceled. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jose R. Almonte on 10/25/2023.
|
| Filing 6 Proposed Order Capping the Amount in Controversy and Remanding the Matter to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Bergen Vicinage by COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION. (MORAN, MICHAEL) |
|
Filing 5
LETTER ORDER Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 16.1. On 10/31/2023 at 3:00 PM there shall be an Initial Scheduling Conference before Magistrate Judge Jose R. Almonte. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jose R. Almonte on 9/13/2023. (wh)
|
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND by COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION.(SANCHEZ, DOUGLAS) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - Please be advised, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(2), unless the Court orders otherwise, in any action filed or removed to this Court, in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity under 28 U.S.C. 1332(a), a party or intervenor must file a disclosure statement naming and identifying the citizenship of every individual or entity whose citizenship is attributed to that party or intervenor. A party, intervenor or proposed intervenor must file the disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court. #Click here to complete the Diversity Disclosure Statement, once complete, file it using the event Diversity Disclosure Statement. (wh) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by MICHAEL T. MORAN on behalf of COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION (MORAN, MICHAEL) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION. (SANCHEZ, DOUGLAS) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Bergen Vicinage, case number BER-L-3535-23. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-14662340), filed by COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(SANCHEZ, DOUGLAS) |
| CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (jr) |
| Case assigned to Judge Madeline Cox Arleo and Magistrate Judge Jose R. Almonte. (jr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
