RAMIREZ et al v. VICTORIA PARKING, LLC et al
| ROSA A RAMIREZ, MICHAEL O. RAMIREZ and MIGUEL RUIZ |
| VICTORIA PARKING, LLC |
| 2:2023cv20138 |
| September 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Andre M Espinosa |
| Michael E Farbiarz |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND by All Defendants.(DEGROOT, ROBERT) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by ROSA A RAMIREZ, MICHAEL O. RAMIREZ. MIGUEL RUIZ served on 9/19/2023, answer due 10/10/2023. (BARROS, DIEGO) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by ROSA A RAMIREZ, MICHAEL O. RAMIREZ. VICTORIA PARKING, LLC served on 9/19/2023, answer due 10/10/2023. (BARROS, DIEGO) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to MIGUEL RUIZ, VICTORIA PARKING, LLC. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (qa, ) |
| Case assigned to Judge Michael E. Farbiarz and Magistrate Judge Andre M. Espinosa. (jr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MIGUEL RUIZ, VICTORIA PARKING, LLC ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-14678311) with JURY DEMAND, filed by ROSA A RAMIREZ, MICHAEL O. RAMIREZ. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(BARROS, DIEGO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
