MARTINEZ v. ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
CARLOS R. MARTINEZ |
ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and MICHAEL OJILADE |
2:2023cv20378 |
September 14, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Andre M Espinosa |
Kevin McNulty |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 SUMMONS ISSUED as to MICHAEL OJILADE. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (ld, ) |
USM-285 Form received for MICHAEL OJILADE. (ld)(n/m) |
Filing 7 CLERK'S LETTER: Transmittal of USM 285 Forms. (Transmittal letter mailed to plaintiff) (sm) |
Filing 6 ORDER that the Clerk of Court shall REOPEN this proceeding; the complaint as against Essex County Correctional Facility is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; that the deliberate indifference claim against Michael Ojilade is permitted to proceed; that Martinezs motion for USMS service (DE 4) is GRANTED; that the Clerk of Court shall provide Martinez with a copy of the USM-285 form for Ojilade; that Martinez shall, within 30 days, complete the USM-285 form for Ojilade and return it to the Clerk of Court, Martin Luther King Building and U.S. Courthouse, 50 Walnut Street, Room 4015, Newark, NJ 07101; pon Martinezs submission of the completed form to the Clerk of Court, the Clerk shall issue summonses, and the United States Marshals shall serve a copy of the complaint (DE 1), summons, and this order upon Ojilade pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3), that Ojilade shall file and serve a responsive pleading within the time specified in Rule 12, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1997e(g)(2), the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order upon Martinez by regular U.S. mail. Signed by Judge Kevin McNulty on 10/10/2023. (sm) |
Filing 5 OPINION. Signed by Judge Kevin McNulty on 10/10/2023. (sm) |
The NEFs for #5 and #6 , the Opinion #5 and Order #6 and blank USM-285 forms were mailed to CARLOS R. MARTINEZ (sm) Modified on 10/18/2023 (sm). |
Set/Reset Deadlines as to #4 MOTION For an Order Compelling The U.S. Marshal to Serve Summons and Complaint on Defendants Under Rule(c)(3). Motion set for 11/6/2023 before Judge Kevin McNulty. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (ld, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER that the Clerk of Court shall administratively terminate this action; that any request to reopen this action shall include either the appropriate filing fee or a completed IFP application accompanied by a certified account statement; that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order and a blank IFP application (DNJ-Pro Se-007-A-(Rev.12/2020)) upon Martinez by regular U.S. mail. Signed by Judge Kevin McNulty on 10/5/2023. (ld)(n/m) |
***Civil Case Terminated. (ld, ) |
Filing 4 MOTION For an Order Compelling The U.S. Marshal to Serve Summons and Complaint on Defendants Under Rule(c)(3) by CARLOS R. MARTINEZ. (ld)(n/m) |
Filing 2 Notice of Guidelines for Appearing Pro Se (mj) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, MICHAEL OJILADE (Filing and Admin fee $402 receipt number NEW48992) with JURY DEMAND, filed by CARLOS R. MARTINEZ. (mj) Modified on 9/15/2023 (ps). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.