MOLINA v. WALMART SUPERCENTER #5752 et al
| KIMBERLYN MOLINA |
| WALMART SUPERCENTER #5752, JOHN DOES 1-10 and XYZ COMPANIES 1-10 |
| 2:2023cv20404 |
| September 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| James B Clark |
| William J Martini |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
LETTER ORDER: Initial Conference set for 11/27/2023 at 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge James B. Clark. Signed by Magistrate Judge James B. Clark on 10/4/2023. (seb)
|
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND with Affirmative Defenses by WALMART SUPERCENTER #5752.(BISHOP, MICHAEL) |
| CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (ps) |
| Judge William J. Martini and Magistrate Judge James B. Clark added. (ps) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by WALMART SUPERCENTER #5752 identifying Wal-Mart, Inc. (f/k/a Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.) as Corporate Parent.. (BISHOP, MICHAEL) |
| Filing 2 Diversity Disclosure Statement by WALMART SUPERCENTER #5752. (BISHOP, MICHAEL) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by WALMART SUPERCENTER #5752 from Superior Court of NJ, Essex County, case number ESX-L-2351-23. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-14695957), filed by WALMART SUPERCENTER #5752. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(BISHOP, MICHAEL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
