RUSCIGNO v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
| CHRISTINE RUSCIGNO |
| COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY |
| 2:2023cv20958 |
| October 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Julien Xavier Neals |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Letter from Plaintiff's Counsel. (GAECHTER, STEVEN) |
Filing 4
TEXT ORDER - The parties shall adhere to the following briefing schedule: Plaintiff's brief shall be filed no later than January 7, 2024. Defendant's brief shall be filed no later than February 7, 2024. Plaintiff may file a reply brief no later than February 22, 2024. NO ENLARGEMENTS OF TIME WILL BE GRANTED. Oral argument will be conducted virtually on April 3, 2024, at 11:00 a.m. before Judge Julien Xavier Neals. Counsel shall confirm their attendance via letter filed on the CM/ECF by close of business day December 20, 2023.So Ordered by Judge Julien Xavier Neals on 12/13/2023. (kd)
|
| Filing 3 Administrative Record Filed. For complaints filed after December 1, 2022, under the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions Under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), the plaintiff must file and serve on the Commissioner a brief for the requested relief within 30 days after the answer is filed or 30 days after entry of an order disposing of the last remaining motion filed under Rule 4(c), whichever is later. The Commissioner must file a brief and serve it on the plaintiff within 30 days after service of the plaintiffs brief. The plaintiff may file a reply brief and serve it on the Commissioner within 14 days after service of the Commissioners brief. (Attachments: #1 Part 2, #2 Part 3, #3 Part 4, #4 Part 5, #5 Part 6, #6 Part 7, #7 Part 8, #8 Part 9)(VON SCHEVEN, ANNE) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED and Electronically Served via ECF as to COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY within 60 days of the date of this entry The Commissioner of Social Security shall file and serve either a dispositive motion or the Certified Administrative Record Pursuant to the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g). (sm) |
| Notice of Judicial Preferences. #Click here for the Judge's Individual Procedure Requirements. (kd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-14770363), filed by CHRISTINE RUSCIGNO. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(GAECHTER, STEVEN) |
| Case assigned to Judge Julien Xavier Neals. (jr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: RUSCIGNO v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: CHRISTINE RUSCIGNO | |
| Represented By: | STEVEN GAECHTER |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
