COMPTON v. AMAZON
DAVID COMPTON |
AMAZON LOGISTICS, INC., AMAZON, JOHN DOE(S) 1-10, PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY and ABC CORPORATION(S) 1-10 |
2:2023cv21083 |
October 11, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Michael A Hammer |
William J Martini |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND , CROSSCLAIM against ABC CORPORATION(S) 1-10, JOHN DOE(S) 1-10 by AMAZON.(MCCONNELL, JOHN) |
Filing 6 TEXT ORDER: Telephone Scheduling Conference set for 1/16/2024 at 10:30 a.m. The parties will dial 1-888-684-8852 and access code 1456817# to join the conference. The parties shall file a joint discovery plan by 1/11/2024. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer on 10/25/2023. (jqb, ) |
Clerk's Text Order - The document #5 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by AMAZON has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 11/1/2023. (dam) |
Filing 5 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to Plaintiff's Complaint.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Certification)(MCCONNELL, JOHN) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by JOSHUA E SONSTEIN on behalf of AMAZON (SONSTEIN, JOSHUA) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by AMAZON. (MCCONNELL, JOHN) Modified on 10/12/2023 (dam). |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by AMAZON. (MCCONNELL, JOHN) |
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed did not include a Civil Cover Sheet (JS-44), which is required to be submitted along with the initial pleading, as indicated in the Attorney Case Opening Guide. Please complete and file a #Civil Cover Sheet using the event Exhibit (to Document) found under Civil/Other Filings/Other Documents. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (dam) |
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - Please be advised, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, a disclosure statement is required to be filed by a nongovernmental corporate party or intervenor. Please refer to the Court's website at #www.njd.uscourts.gov for a form and filing instructions. (dam) |
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - Please be advised, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(2), unless the Court orders otherwise, in any action filed or removed to this Court, in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity under 28 U.S.C. 1332(a), a party or intervenor must file a disclosure statement naming and identifying the citizenship of every individual or entity whose citizenship is attributed to that party or intervenor. A party, intervenor or proposed intervenor must file the disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court. #Click here to complete the Diversity Disclosure Statement, once complete, file it using the event Diversity Disclosure Statement. (dam) |
Case Assigned to Judge William J. Martini and Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer. (ak, ) |
CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (ak, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by AMAZON from Superior Court of Middlesex County, case number MID-L-003402-23. (Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-14781384), filed by AMAZON LOGISTICS, INC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - C) (MCCONNELL, JOHN) Modified on 10/12/2023 (dam). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.