WILLIAMS v. PHOENIX FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC et al
| BARBARA WILLIAMS |
| PHOENIX FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC and JOHN DOES 1-25 |
| 2:2023cv21092 |
| October 11, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Madeline Cox Arleo |
| Cathy L Waldor |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Clerk`s Text Order - The document #3 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by PHOENIX FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 11/22/2023. (lag, ) |
| Filing 3 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer Attorney AARON RAPHAEL EASLEY for PHOENIX FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC added. (EASLEY, AARON) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to PHOENIX FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (lag, ) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Madeline Cox Arleo and Magistrate Judge Cathy L. Waldor. (ak, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JOHN DOES 1-25, PHOENIX FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-14782132) with JURY DEMAND, filed by BARBARA WILLIAMS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(JONES, JOSEPH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
