SAMPLE v. ARAMARK SERVICES, INC. et al
Plaintiff: WILLIAM G. SAMPLE
Defendant: ARAMARK SERVICES, INC., PATRICIA PACTANAC, SAMANTHA BAINTON, JOHN DOES 1-10 (Fictitious Names Representing Unknown Persons) and ABC Corps 1-10 Fictitious
Case Number: 2:2023cv21317
Filed: October 19, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Presiding Judge: Jessica S Allen
Referring Judge: Brian R Martinotti
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 LETTER ORDER: Initial Conference set for 1/5/2024 at 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Jessica S. Allen. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jessica S. Allen on 11/28/23. (jbb)
November 27, 2023 Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint by PATRICIA PACTANAC.(DESMEDT, EMILY)
November 27, 2023 Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by SAMANTHA BAINTON.(DESMEDT, EMILY)
November 27, 2023 Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by ARAMARK SERVICES, INC..(DESMEDT, EMILY)
November 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 CONSENT ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANTS' DEADLINE TO ANSWER, MOVE, OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT; that Defendants' deadline to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended from November 9, 2023 to November 27, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jessica S. Allen on 11/13/2023. (ld, )
November 9, 2023 Filing 5 Proposed Order Consent Order Extending Defendants' Time to Answer by All Defendants. (DESMEDT, EMILY)
October 27, 2023 Clerk`s Text Order - The document #4 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by SAMANTHA BAINTON, PATRICIA PACTANAC, ARAMARK SERVICES, INC. has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 11/9/2023. (qa, )
October 25, 2023 Filing 4 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer. (DESMEDT, EMILY)
October 25, 2023 Filing 3 Diversity Disclosure Statement by ARAMARK SERVICES, INC., SAMANTHA BAINTON, PATRICIA PACTANAC. (DESMEDT, EMILY)
October 20, 2023 Judge Brian R. Martinotti and Magistrate Judge Jessica S. Allen added. (ps)
October 20, 2023 CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - Please be advised, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(2), unless the Court orders otherwise, in any action filed or removed to this Court, in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity under 28 U.S.C. 1332(a), a party or intervenor must file a disclosure statement naming and identifying the citizenship of every individual or entity whose citizenship is attributed to that party or intervenor. A party, intervenor or proposed intervenor must file the disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court. #Click here to complete the Diversity Disclosure Statement, once complete, file it using the event Diversity Disclosure Statement. (ld, )
October 19, 2023 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by ARAMARK SERVICES, INC.. (DESMEDT, EMILY)
October 19, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by SAMANTHA BAINTON, PATRICIA PACTANAC, ARAMARK SERVICES, INC. from Superior Court of New Jersey, Union County, case number UNN-L-003030-23. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-14807569), filed by SAMANTHA BAINTON, PATRICIA PACTANAC, ARAMARK SERVICES, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A through Exhibit C, #2 Declaration of Patricia Pactanac, #3 Declaration of Samantha Bainton, #4 Declaration of Amy Golembo, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(DESMEDT, EMILY)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SAMPLE v. ARAMARK SERVICES, INC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: WILLIAM G. SAMPLE
Represented By: JAMISON MICHAEL MARK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ARAMARK SERVICES, INC.
Represented By: EMILY C. DESMEDT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PATRICIA PACTANAC
Represented By: EMILY C. DESMEDT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SAMANTHA BAINTON
Represented By: EMILY C. DESMEDT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN DOES 1-10 (Fictitious Names Representing Unknown Persons)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ABC Corps 1-10 Fictitious
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?