PIETROCOLA v. CHELSEA SENIOR LIVING, LLC et al
| KATHLEEN PIETROCOLA |
| CHELSEA SENIOR LIVING, LLC, CHRIS SLAVICEK, EDIE EMPIRIO, ROGER BERNIER, KATHY MERKEL and SCOTT YAEGER |
| 2:2023cv21705 |
| October 31, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Katharine S Hayden |
| Leda D Wettre |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 451 Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to ROGER BERNIER, CHELSEA SENIOR LIVING, LLC, EDIE EMPIRIO, KATHY MERKEL, CHRIS SLAVICEK, SCOTT YAEGER. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (lag, ) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Katharine S. Hayden and Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre. (ak, ) |
| Filing 3 Request for Summons to be Issued by KATHLEEN PIETROCOLA as to ROGER BERNIER, CHELSEA SENIOR LIVING, LLC, EDIE EMPIRIO, KATHY MERKEL, CHRIS SLAVICEK, SCOTT YAEGER. (CHARNY, NATHANIEL) |
| Filing 2 Exhibit to #1 Complaint Civil Cover Sheet by KATHLEEN PIETROCOLA. (CHARNY, NATHANIEL) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ROGER BERNIER, CHELSEA SENIOR LIVING, LLC, EDIE EMPIRIO, KATHY MERKEL, CHRIS SLAVICEK, SCOTT YAEGER ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-14836051) with JURY DEMAND, filed by KATHLEEN PIETROCOLA.(CHARNY, NATHANIEL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
