FRIEDLANDER v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
| ITZHAK FRIEDLANDER |
| MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. |
| 2:2023cv21715 |
| October 31, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Claire C Cecchi |
| Leda D Wettre |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
STIPULATION AND ORDER extending time to respond to plaintiff's complaint through 1/18/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre on 11/22/2023. (lag, )
|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by ITZHAK FRIEDLANDER. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. served on 11/13/2023, answer due 12/4/2023. (SIDDIQUI, MUHAMMAD) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint by MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.. (CIALINO, THOMAS) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by THOMAS P. CIALINO on behalf of MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. (CIALINO, THOMAS) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by MICHAEL P. TRAINOR on behalf of MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. (TRAINOR, MICHAEL) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - Please be advised that the #5 Joint Stipulation to extend time to respond to plaintiff's complaint filed by THOMAS CIALINO on 11/21/2023 was submitted in error as a motion. The motion will be terminated and the subsequent deadlines set by the Clerk's Office may be disregarded. This message is for informational purposes only. (lag, ) |
| Set Deadlines as to #5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint . Motion set for 12/18/2023 before Judge Claire C. Cecchi. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (lag, ) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (lag, ) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Claire C. Cecchi and Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre. (ak, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-14836347) with JURY DEMAND, filed by ITZHAK FRIEDLANDER. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(SIDDIQUI, MUHAMMAD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: FRIEDLANDER v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ITZHAK FRIEDLANDER | |
| Represented By: | MUHAMMAD HASAN SIDDIQUI |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. | |
| Represented By: | MICHAEL P. TRAINOR |
| Represented By: | THOMAS P. CIALINO |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
