CLEAR SPRING PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANY v. SQUARE DEAL CONSTRUCTION et al
| CLEAR SPRING PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANY |
| SQUARE DEAL CONSTRUCTION, EVAN BURKE, Lysander Chan, Marylouise Chan and ABC CORP. 1-5 |
| 2:2023cv22492 |
| November 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Brian R Martinotti |
| Cathy L Waldor |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Letter from Paul A. Sandars, III, Esq. re #3 Notice of Appearance. (SANDARS, PAUL) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by PAUL A. SANDARS, III on behalf of Lysander Chan, Marylouise Chan (SANDARS, PAUL) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to EVAN BURKE, Lysander Chan, Marylouise Chan, SQUARE DEAL CONSTRUCTION. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (lag, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against EVAN BURKE, ABC CORP. 1-5, Lysander Chan, Marylouise Chan, SQUARE DEAL CONSTRUCTION ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-14882864) with JURY DEMAND, filed by CLEAR SPRING PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits A-C)(BLAKE, DAVID) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Brian R. Martinotti and Magistrate Judge Cathy L. Waldor. (ak, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
