HAS v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
BAYRAMALI HAS |
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, UR M. JADDOU, JOHN E. THOMPSON, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES (USCIS) |
2:2023cv22593 |
November 22, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Esther Salas |
Other Immigration Actions |
05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by FRANCES C. BAJADA on behalf of UR M. JADDOU, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, JOHN E. THOMPSON, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES (USCIS) (BAJADA, FRANCES) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to UR M. JADDOU, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, JOHN E. THOMPSON, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES (USCIS). Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (dam) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES (USCIS), ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU, JOHN E. THOMPSON (Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-14890267), filed by BAYRAMALI HAS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons) (HAJDARPASIC, ENES) Modified on 11/26/2023 (dam). |
Case Assigned to Judge Esther Salas. (ak, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.