ZEMEL et al v. DURGIN
ELLIOT ZEMEL and KOZE INVESTMENTS, LLC |
RICHARD DURGIN and RICHARD DURGIN, JR. |
2:2023cv22660 |
November 28, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Stanley R Chesler |
Cathy L Waldor |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 TEXT ORDER: For good cause shown, Defendants request for an extension of time to respond to the complaint is granted. Defendant shall file a response by 2/26/24. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cathy L. Waldor on 1/23/24. (tjg, ) |
Filing 10 Letter requesting additional time to answer from RICHARD DURGIN. (mxw, )(Received via ECF Help Desk Email) |
Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Richard Durgin, Jr. on 1/5/24, filed by KOZE INVESTMENTS, LLC, ELLIOT ZEMEL. (SCHWALB, EFREM) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS ISSUED as to RICHARD DURGIN. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (mxw, ) |
Filing 7 Request for Summons to be Issued by ELLIOT ZEMEL, KOZE INVESTMENTS, LLC as to RICHARD DURGIN. (BENSCHAR, TAL) |
Judge Stanley R. Chesler and Magistrate Judge Cathy L. Waldor added. (ps) |
Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by KOZE INVESTMENTS, LLC, ELLIOT ZEMEL. (SCHWALB, EFREM) |
Filing 5 Exhibit to #1 Complaint Civil Cover Sheet by KOZE INVESTMENTS, LLC, ELLIOT ZEMEL. (SCHWALB, EFREM) |
Filing 4 Diversity Disclosure Statement by KOZE INVESTMENTS, LLC, ELLIOT ZEMEL. (SCHWALB, EFREM) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by TAL S. BENSCHAR on behalf of All Plaintiffs (BENSCHAR, TAL) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by KOZE INVESTMENTS, LLC, ELLIOT ZEMEL. (SCHWALB, EFREM) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against RICHARD DURGIN ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-14896950) with JURY DEMAND, filed by ELLIOT ZEMEL, KOZE INVESTMENTS, LLC.(SCHWALB, EFREM) |
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed did not include a Civil Cover Sheet (JS-44), which is required to be submitted along with the initial pleading, as indicated in the Attorney Case Opening Guide. Please complete and file a #Civil Cover Sheet using the event Exhibit (to Document) found under Civil/Other Filings/Other Documents. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (jjc, ) |
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - Please be advised, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, a disclosure statement is required to be filed by a nongovernmental corporate party or intervenor. Please refer to the Court's website at #www.njd.uscourts.gov for a form and filing instructions. (jjc, ) |
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - Please be advised, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(2), unless the Court orders otherwise, in any action filed or removed to this Court, in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity under 28 U.S.C. 1332(a), a party or intervenor must file a disclosure statement naming and identifying the citizenship of every individual or entity whose citizenship is attributed to that party or intervenor. A party, intervenor or proposed intervenor must file the disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court. #Click here to complete the Diversity Disclosure Statement, once complete, file it using the event Diversity Disclosure Statement. (jjc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.