ABRAHAM v. LIU et al
ALDUJON ABRAHAM |
YU D LIU and METEOR EXPRESS INC. |
2:2023cv22990 |
December 11, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Jose R Almonte |
Esther Salas |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Notice of Judicial Preferences. #Click here for the Judge's Individual Procedure Requirements. (ek) |
Filing 4 LETTER ORDER Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 16.1. On 3/11/2024 at 2:00 PM there shall be an Initial Scheduling Conference before Magistrate Judge Jose R. Almonte. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jose R. Almonte on 1/5/2024. (wh) |
Filing 3 Defendants ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND by YU D LIU, METEOR EXPRESS INC.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service Certificate of Service)(DEVLIN, JOHN) |
Filing 2 Exhibit to #1 Notice of Removal, A, B and C by YU D LIU, METEOR EXPRESS INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(DEVLIN, JOHN) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by METEOR EXPRESS INC., YU D LIU from Union County, NJ, case number UNN-L-2327-23. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 405 receipt number ANJDC-14930697), filed by METEOR EXPRESS INC., YU D LIU. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Brief, #3 Statement Corporate Disclosure)(DEVLIN, JOHN) |
CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (ak, ) |
Case Assigned to Judge Esther Salas and Magistrate Judge Jose R. Almonte. (ak, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.