BEGUM v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES et al
| MUNNI BEGUM |
| NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, JANE AND JOHN DOE 1-10 and ABC CORP. 1-10 |
| 2:2023cv23404 |
| December 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Madeline Cox Arleo |
| James B Clark |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by MIAH B. HAGOOD on behalf of NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES (HAGOOD, MIAH) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (jd, ) |
| Case assigned to Judge Madeline Cox Arleo and Magistrate Judge James B. Clark. (jr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ABC CORP. 1-10, JANE AND JOHN DOE 1-10, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES ( Filing and Admin fee $ 405 receipt number ANJDC-14974421) with JURY DEMAND, filed by MUNNI BEGUM. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(BLACKBURN, TYRONE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
