ALVAREZ et al v. SELENE FINANCE LP
ALICIA ALVAREZ and CIRILO ALVAREZ |
SELENE FINANCE LP |
2:2024cv00139 |
January 9, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Jose R Almonte |
Evelyn Padin |
Contract: Other |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Clerk`s Text Order - The document #5 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by SELENE FINANCE LP has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 2/21/2024. (wh) |
Filing 5 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer. (LIPKIN, JASON) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by JASON ROBERT LIPKIN on behalf of SELENE FINANCE LP (LIPKIN, JASON) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by ALICIA ALVAREZ. SELENE FINANCE LP served on 1/17/2024, answer due 2/7/2024. (CHANG, JOSEPH) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to SELENE FINANCE LP. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (wh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SELENE FINANCE LP ( Filing and Admin fee $ 405 receipt number ANJDC-14997481) with JURY DEMAND, filed by ALICIA ALVAREZ and CIRILO ALVAREZ. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(CHANG, JOSEPH) Modified on 1/10/2024 (wh). |
Judge Evelyn Padin and Magistrate Judge Jose R. Almonte added. (ps) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.