BAROT et al v. U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
| KEYURKUMAR JAYANTILAL BAROT, PINKI KEYURKUMAR BAROT and PRINCY KEYURKUMAR BAROT |
| U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and UR MENDOZA JADDOU |
| 2:2024cv00237 |
| January 15, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Jessica S Allen |
| Michael E Farbiarz |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Letter from AUSA Frances C. Bajada. (BAJADA, FRANCES) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to UR MENDOZA JADDOU, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (ld, ) |
| Case assigned to Judge Michael E. Farbiarz and Magistrate Judge Jessica S. Allen. (jr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against UR MENDOZA JADDOU, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES ( Filing and Admin fee $ 405 receipt number ANJDC-15009872), filed by KEYURKUMAR JAYANTILAL BAROT, PRINCY KEYURKUMAR BAROT, PINKI KEYURKUMAR BAROT. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits A-D, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons as to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, #4 Summons as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou, #5 Summons as to Attorney General, #6 Summons as to US Attorney's Office)(COSTELLO, CAITLIN) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
