AVENTISUB LLC et al v. CONSENSUS HOLDINGS LLC
| AVENTISUB LLC, CHATTEM, INC and SANOFI-AVENTIS US LLC. |
| CONSENSUS HOLDINGS LLC |
| 2:2024cv00257 |
| January 16, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Jessica S Allen |
| Claire C Cecchi |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
LETTER ORDER: Initial Conference set for 4/15/2024 at 1:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Jessica S. Allen. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jessica S. Allen on 2/28/24. (jbb)
|
| Filing 13 Corporate Disclosure Statement by CONSENSUS HOLDINGS LLC. (LEKHT, ELIEZER) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND by CONSENSUS HOLDINGS LLC.(LEKHT, ELIEZER) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by ELIEZER LEKHT on behalf of CONSENSUS HOLDINGS LLC (LEKHT, ELIEZER) |
| Pro Hac Vice counsel, MORGAN T. NICKERSON, ESQ., has been added to receive Notices of Electronic Filing. Pursuant to L.Civ.R. 101.1, only local counsel are entitled to sign and file papers, enter appearances and receive payments on judgments, decrees or orders. (ld, ) |
| Filing 10 Notice of Request by Pro Hac Vice Morgan T. Nickerson to receive Notices of Electronic Filings. (RUBINSTEIN, BENJAMIN) |
| Pro Hac Vice fee received as to Morgan Nickerson $ 150, receipt number TRE137203 (jal, ) |
| Clerk`s Text Order - The document #8 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by CONSENSUS HOLDINGS LLC has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 2/27/2024. (ld, ) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #6 Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to MORGAN T. NICKERSON, ESQ. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jessica S. Allen on 2/13/2024. (dam)
|
| Filing 8 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 1).. (ROTBERG, TUVIA) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by TUVIA ROTBERG on behalf of CONSENSUS HOLDINGS LLC (ROTBERG, TUVIA) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Morgan T. Nickerson) by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Morgan T. Nickerson ISO PHV Admission, #2 Declaration of B. Rubinstein ISO Morgan T. Nickerson PHV Admission, #3 Text of Proposed Order Granting Morgan T. Nickerson PHV Admission, #4 Certificate of Service for Motion to Admit Morgan T. Nickerson PHV)(RUBINSTEIN, BENJAMIN) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by AVENTISUB LLC, SANOFI-AVENTIS US LLC., CHATTEM, INC. CONSENSUS HOLDINGS LLC served on 1/23/2024, answer due 2/13/2024. (RUBINSTEIN, BENJAMIN) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to CONSENSUS HOLDINGS LLC. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (ld, ) |
| Filing 3 AO120 Patent/Trademark Form filed. (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (ld, ) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by AVENTISUB LLC, CHATTEM, INC, SANOFI-AVENTIS US LLC. identifying Sanofi, S.A. as Corporate Parent.. (RUBINSTEIN, BENJAMIN) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CONSENSUS HOLDINGS LLC ( Filing and Admin fee $ 405 receipt number ANJDC-15013341) with JURY DEMAND, filed by AVENTISUB LLC, SANOFI-AVENTIS US LLC., CHATTEM, INC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 AO 120 Form for Complaint)(RUBINSTEIN, BENJAMIN) |
| Case assigned to Judge Claire C. Cecchi and Magistrate Judge Jessica S. Allen. (jr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
