CMA CGM S.A. v. CIS DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION, INC.
| CMA CGM S.A. |
| CIS DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION, INC. |
| 2:2024cv00364 |
| January 22, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| James B Clark |
| Evelyn Padin |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Letter from William Yost re #1 MOTION to Quash/Compel/Enforce Subpoenas ( Filing fee $ 52 receipt number ANJDC-15028705.). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit FMC Scheduling Order)(YOST, WILLIAM) |
| Filing 3 REPLY BRIEF to Opposition to Motion filed by CMA CGM S.A. re #1 MOTION to Quash/Compel/Enforce Subpoenas ( Filing fee $ 52 receipt number ANJDC-15028705.) (Attachments: #1 Declaration Attorney Reply Declaration, #2 Exhibit Email from opposing counsel, #3 Exhibit FMC status report, #4 Exhibit CIS deposition transcript)(YOST, WILLIAM) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATION in Opposition filed by CIS DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION, INC. re #1 MOTION to Quash/Compel/Enforce Subpoenas ( Filing fee $ 52 receipt number ANJDC-15028705.) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit_1 (Email to Counsel for CMA on January 10, 2024), #2 Exhibit Exhibit_2 (Email to Counsel for CMA on January 26, 2024), #3 Exhibit Exhibit_3 (Email to Counsel for CMA on February 1, 2024), #4 Exhibit Exhibit_4 (Email to Counsel for CMA on February 5, 2024), #5 Exhibit Exhibit_5 (Order of the Federal Maritime Commission))(POGIL, GARRY) |
| Set Deadlines as to #1 MOTION to Quash/Compel/Enforce Subpoenas ( Filing fee $ 52 receipt number ANJDC-15028705.). Motion set for 2/20/2024 before Magistrate Judge James B. Clark. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (jd, ) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Evelyn Padin and Magistrate Judge James B. Clark. (ak, ) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Quash/Compel/Enforce Subpoenas ( Filing fee $ 52 receipt number ANJDC-15028705.), filed by CMA CGM S.A.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Attorney Declaration, #2 Exhibit Amended Complaint, #3 Exhibit Answer, #4 Exhibit Document Subpoena with AOS, #5 Exhibit Deposition Subpoena with AOS, #6 Exhibit Notice of Intent to Enforce Subpoena, #7 Exhibit Fax and Email Confirmation, #8 Brief Brief in Support, #9 Proposed Order, #10 Certificate of Service Certificate of Service)(YOST, WILLIAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: CMA CGM S.A. v. CIS DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: CMA CGM S.A. | |
| Represented By: | WILLIAM H. YOST, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: CIS DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION, INC. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
