ELEZAJ v. MAYORKAS et al
| ERMELINDA ELEZAJ |
| ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, JOHN THOMPSON, UR M. JADDOU and MERRICK BRIAN GARLAND |
| 2:2024cv00935 |
| February 19, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Brian R Martinotti |
| Leda D Wettre |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to MERRICK BRIAN GARLAND, UR M. JADDOU, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, JOHN THOMPSON. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (ams, ) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The #1 Complaint submitted by Patrick C. Crowley on 2/19/2024 appears to have address information that does not match the court's records. Please update your address information through Manage My Account on your PACER Account. (ams, ) |
| Judge Brian R. Martinotti and Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre added. (ps) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MERRICK BRIAN GARLAND, UR M. JADDOU, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, JOHN THOMPSON ( Filing and Admin fee $ 405 receipt number ANJDC-15098786), filed by ERMELINDA ELEZAJ. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A 797 Asylum, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B USCIS Memo, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Coversheet, #4 Summons Summons)(CROWLEY, PATRICK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
