SON v. GARLAND et al
| MERRICK GARLAND |
| JI YOUNG SON |
| ATTORNEY GENERAL MERRICK B GARLAND, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE NATIONAL VISA CENTER and RENA BITTER |
| 2:2024cv00942 |
| February 20, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Cathy L Waldor |
| Susan D Wigenton |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by JI YOUNG SON. RENA BITTER served on 2/29/2024, answer due 4/29/2024; MERRICK GARLAND served on 2/29/2024, answer due 4/29/2024; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE NATIONAL VISA CENTER served on 2/29/2024, answer due 4/29/2024. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service Receipt of Certified Mail)(CHOI, YUNSUNG) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to RENA BITTER, MERRICK GARLAND, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE NATIONAL VISA CENTER. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (dam) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against RENA BITTER, MERRICK B GARLAND, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE NATIONAL VISA CENTER ( Filing and Admin fee $ 405 receipt number ANJDC-15099674), filed by JI YOUNG SON. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit)(CHOI, YUNSUNG) |
| Judge Susan D. Wigenton and Magistrate Judge Cathy L. Waldor added. (ps) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
