THOMPSON v. UNION COUNTY DIVISION OF SOCIAL SERVICES et al
CALVIN THOMPSON |
UNION COUNTY DIVISION OF SOCIAL SERVICES, KAMILI WILLIAMS, DEBBIE ANDERSON, SHARONDA LIGGON and RICHARD WEISLO |
2:2024cv01471 |
March 4, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Jessica S Allen |
Susan D Wigenton |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
***Civil Case Terminated per Order at D.E. #6 . (sm) |
Filing 7 Proposal for Federal Intervention from Calvin Thompson. (via Help Desk) (sm) |
Filing 6 ORDER that Plaintiffs IFP Application is GRANTED; that Plaintiffs Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; that Plaintiff shall have thirty (30) days to file an amended Complaint. Failure to timely file an amended Complaint may result in the dismissal of this matter with prejudice. Signed by Judge Susan D. Wigenton on 4/17/2024. (sm) |
Filing 5 WHEREAS OPINION. Signed by Judge Susan D. Wigenton on 4/17/2024. (sm) (Main Document 5 replaced on 4/23/2024) (sm, ). |
Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Pro Bono by CALVIN THOMPSON. (sm) |
Filing 3 Notice of Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of Summons by CALVIN THOMPSON (sm) Modified on 3/12/2024 (sm). |
Filing 2 Notice of Guidelines for Appearing Pro Se (and) |
Filing 1 Complaint Received. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Certification, #3 Application IFP, #4 Proposed IFP, #5 E Consent Form) (and) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.