CHAMBERS v. CANAM STEEL CORPORATION et al
| NOEL CHAMBERS |
| CANAM STEEL CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1-5 AND 6-10 |
| 2:2024cv02682 |
| March 13, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Esther Salas |
| Cathy L Waldor |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by CANAM STEEL CORPORATION identifying CANAM STEEL CORPORATION as Corporate Parent.. (SGAMBATI, RONALD) |
| Filing 2 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer Attorney RONALD V. SGAMBATI for CANAM STEEL CORPORATION added. (SGAMBATI, RONALD) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by CANAM STEEL CORPORATION from Superior Court of New Jersey, Middlesex County, case number MID-L-001021-24. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 405 receipt number ANJDC-15169691), filed by CANAM STEEL CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Compliance, #2 Declaration of Ron W. Peppe II, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Certificate of Service)(SGAMBATI, RONALD) |
| Clerk`s Text Order - The document #2 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by CANAM STEEL CORPORATION has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 4/3/2024. (lag, ) |
| Judge Esther Salas and Magistrate Judge Cathy L. Waldor added. (ps) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
