ATLAS DATA PRIVACY CORPORATION et al v. CHOREOGRAPH LLC et al
ATLAS DATA PRIVACY CORPORATION, JANE DOE-1, JANE DOE-2, EDWIN MALDONADO, SCOTT MALONEY, JUSTYNA MALONEY, PATRICK COLLIGAN, PETER ANDREYEV and WILLIAM SULLIVAN |
CHOREOGRAPH LLC, RICHARD ROES 1-10 and ABC COMPANIES 1-10 |
2:2024cv04271 |
March 27, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by CHOREOGRAPH LLC re #1 Notice of Removal, #4 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order, #2 Corporate Disclosure Statement (aty), #3 Diversity Disclosure Statement (SCHOENFELD, ALAN) |
Filing 4 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer. (SCHOENFELD, ALAN) |
Filing 3 Diversity Disclosure Statement by CHOREOGRAPH LLC. (SCHOENFELD, ALAN) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by CHOREOGRAPH LLC identifying WPP plc as Corporate Parent.. (SCHOENFELD, ALAN) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by CHOREOGRAPH LLC from SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, BERGEN COUNTY, case number BER L 00920 24. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 405 receipt number ANJDC-15219646), filed by CHOREOGRAPH LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(SCHOENFELD, ALAN) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.