CAMPBELL v. PITTMAN et al
| GLEN CAMPBELL |
| YOLANDA PITTMAN, JOHN TSOUKARIS, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and MERRICK GARLAND |
| 2:2024cv04725 |
| April 10, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Stanley R Chesler |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Exhibit to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, by Glen Campbell. (HUFSTADER, REBECCA)NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Counsel is advised that pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.3(c)(2), a single, consolidated motion to seal shall be filed within 14 days following the completed briefing of the materials sought to be sealed, or within 14 days following the date on which the last of such materials was filed under temporary seal if the motion is resolved, unless otherwise directed by the Court. |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number ANJDC-15268674.), filed by Glen Campbell. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Pet. Declaration (Redacted), #3 Exhibit B - Attorney Declaration, #4 Exhibit C - NTA, #5 Exhibit D - IJ Bond Order, #6 Exhibit E - IJ CAT Grant Order, #7 Exhibit F - EOIR Portal Summary)(HUFSTADER, REBECCA) |
| Case assigned to Judge Stanley R. Chesler. (jr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
