SHABAREK v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES
| ABDULLAH SHABAREK |
| UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, UR MENDOZA JADDOU and TERRI ROBBINSON |
| 2:2024cv04958 |
| April 15, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Michael E Farbiarz |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to UR MENDOZA JADDOU, TERRI ROBBINSON, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (and) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (and) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Guidelines for Appearing Pro Se (and) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES (Filing and Admin fee $ 405 receipt number 50045), filed by ABDULLAH SHABAREK. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit) (and) |
| The complaint #1 submitted by ABDULLAH SHABAREK on 4/15/24 did not contain a proper signature. PLEASE RESUBMIT THE DOCUMENT WITH THE PROPER WET OR SCANNED SIGNATURE. This submission will remain on the docket unless otherwise ordered by the court. (and) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
