PURCELL et al v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES
| Michael Purcell, John Purcell, Katrina Purcell, Edward Purcell and Bridget Purcell |
| UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES |
| 2:2024cv05213 |
| April 17, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES ( Filing and Admin fee $ 405 receipt number ANJDC-15293122), filed by Michael Purcell, Edward Purcell, Katrina Purcell, John Purcell, Bridget Purcell. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Form I-485, #2 Exhibit Agency decision, #3 Exhibit Motion to reopen before agency, #4 Exhibit Agency decision denying reopen, #5 Exhibit I-140 petition approval, #6 Exhibit Notice of reopening I-485, #7 Exhibit Notice of Intent to Deny I-485, #8 Exhibit Plaintiff's response to Notice of Intent to Deny, #9 Exhibit Agency 2nd decision denying I-485, #10 Exhibit Plaintiff's motion to reopen and reconsider 2nd decision, #11 Exhibit Agency's 2nd denial of motion to reopen, #12 Index Index of Exhibits, #13 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover sheet, #14 Summons Summons)(ZHAO, YI) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
