MUKHERJEE v. APPLE, INC.
Plaintiff: AYAN MUKHERJEE
Defendant: APPLE, INC.
Case Number: 2:2024cv06131
Filed: May 14, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Presiding Judge: Julien Xavier Neals
Referring Judge: Leda D Wettre
Nature of Suit: Anti-Trust
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 2 Antitrust Litigation
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 14, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against APPLE, INC. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 405 receipt number ANJDC-15366249) with JURY DEMAND, filed by AYAN MUKHERJEE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(SEEGER, CHRISTOPHER)
May 14, 2024 Judge Julien Xavier Neals and Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre added. (ps)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MUKHERJEE v. APPLE, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: AYAN MUKHERJEE
Represented By: CHRISTOPHER A. SEEGER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: APPLE, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?