RODRIGUEZ v. SCROZATI et al
| JESSIE RODRIGUEZ |
| JOSEPH SCROZATI, ABC CORPORATIONS 1-5 (fictitious names describing presently unidentified business entities), RELIANT SERVICES, INC. and JOHN DOES 1-5 (fictitious names describing presently unidentified individuals) |
| 2:2024cv07334 |
| June 27, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| James B Clark |
| Brian R Martinotti |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Notice of Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
LETTER ORDER: Initial Conference set for 9/24/2024 at 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge James B. Clark. Signed by Magistrate Judge James B. Clark on 7/22/2024. (seb)
|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND by RELIANT SERVICES, INC., JOSEPH SCROZATI.(KAMVOSOULIS, THOMAS) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by RELIANT SERVICES, INC., JOSEPH SCROZATI. (KAMVOSOULIS, THOMAS) |
| Filing 4 Diversity Disclosure Statement by RELIANT SERVICES, INC., JOSEPH SCROZATI. (KAMVOSOULIS, THOMAS) (Main Document 4 replaced on 7/10/2024) (jd, ). |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by ROBERT J. PAPAZIAN on behalf of RELIANT SERVICS, INC., JOSEPH SCROZATI (PAPAZIAN, ROBERT) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - Please be advised, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(2), unless the Court orders otherwise, in any action filed or removed to this Court, in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity under 28 U.S.C. 1332(a), a party or intervenor must file a disclosure statement naming and identifying the citizenship of every individual or entity whose citizenship is attributed to that party or intervenor. A party, intervenor or proposed intervenor must file the disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court. #Click here to complete the Diversity Disclosure Statement, once complete, file it using the event Diversity Disclosure Statement. (jd, ) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - Please be advised, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, a disclosure statement is required to be filed by a nongovernmental corporate party or intervenor. Please refer to the Court's website at #www.njd.uscourts.gov for a form and filing instructions. (jd, ) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: Plaintiff's Attorney Information,Disclosure Statement, . The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (jd, ) |
| Clerk`s Text Order - The document #2 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by Defendants RELIANT SERVICES, INC., JOSEPH SCROZATI has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been reset for 7/22/2024. (jd, ) |
| Filing 2 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to Complaint.. (KAMVOSOULIS, THOMAS) |
| Judge Brian R. Martinotti and Magistrate Judge James B. Clark added. (ps) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by RELIANT SERVICES, INC., JOSEPH SCROZATI from Superior Court of New Jersey, case number HUD-L-1901-24. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 405 receipt number ANJDC-15478753), filed by RELIANT SERVICES, INC., JOSEPH SCROZATI. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Summons & Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(KAMVOSOULIS, THOMAS) Modified on 7/3/2024 (jd, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
