WILDE v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC
DAVID WILDE |
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC |
2:2024cv07560 |
July 5, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Stacey D Adams |
Evelyn Padin |
Labor: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 6 Letter from Adam H. Settle Requesting Withdrawal of Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice re #5 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice . (SETTLE, ADAM) |
Set Deadlines as to #5 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion set for 9/3/2024 before Magistrate Judge Stacey D. Adams. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (mxw, ) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice by UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Text of Proposed Order, #3 Declaration)(SETTLE, ADAM) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC identifying United Parcel Service, Inc. as Corporate Parent.. (SETTLE, ADAM) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint by UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.(SETTLE, ADAM) |
Filing 2 Diversity Disclosure Statement by UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. (SETTLE, ADAM) |
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - Please be advised, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(2), unless the Court orders otherwise, in any action filed or removed to this Court, in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity under 28 U.S.C. 1332(a), a party or intervenor must file a disclosure statement naming and identifying the citizenship of every individual or entity whose citizenship is attributed to that party or intervenor. A party, intervenor or proposed intervenor must file the disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court. #Click here to complete the Diversity Disclosure Statement, once complete, file it using the event Diversity Disclosure Statement. (mxw, ) |
Case assigned to Judge Evelyn Padin and Magistrate Judge Stacey D. Adams. (jr) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC from Superior Court of New Jersey Bergen County, case number BER-L-3143-24. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 405 receipt number ANJDC-15496532), filed by UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(SETTLE, ADAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: WILDE v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC | |
Represented By: | ADAM H. SETTLE |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: DAVID WILDE | |
Represented By: | JONATHAN I. NIRENBERG |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.