ROSARIO v. EATON CORPORATION et al
| PEDRO ROSARIO |
| FIDELITY INVESTMENTS, EATON CORPORATION and SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC. |
| 2:2024cv07725 |
| July 12, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer Attorney JOCELYN ANNISE MERCED for EATON CORPORATION,JOCELYN ANNISE MERCED for FIDELITY INVESTMENTS,JOCELYN ANNISE MERCED for SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC. added. (MERCED, JOCELYN) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by FIDELITY INVESTMENTS. (MERCED, JOCELYN) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC.. (MERCED, JOCELYN) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by EATON CORPORATION. (MERCED, JOCELYN) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by FIDELITY INVESTMENTS, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC., EATON CORPORATION from Superior Court of Bergen County, case number BER L 3477 24. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 405 receipt number ANJDC-15512806), filed by FIDELITY INVESTMENTS, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC., EATON CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex A to Notice of Removal - State Court Summons and Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(MERCED, JOCELYN) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
