PARISH GOVERNMENT RISK MANAGEMENT AGENCY v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
| PARISH GOVERNMENT RISK MANAGEMENT AGENCY |
| ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, NOVO NORDISK INC. and SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC |
| INSULIN PRICING LITIGATION |
| 2:2024cv08097 |
| July 29, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Brian R Martinotti |
| Rukhsanah L Singh |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, NOVO NORDISK INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (krg, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, NOVO NORDISK INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC ( Filing and Admin fee $ 405 receipt number ANJDC-15549771) with JURY DEMAND, filed by PARISH GOVERNMENT RISK MANAGEMENT AGENCY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ROBERTSON, PEARL) |
| Member Case Direct File on 7/29/2024, for MDL 3080 INSULIN PRICING LITIGATION. (krg, ) |
| This case is part of MDL 3080. Parties are expected to review and abide by all prior orders entered in this MDL, which can be found #here. (krg, ) |
| Judge Brian R. Martinotti and Magistrate Judge Rukhsanah L. Singh added. (krg, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
