TINSLEY v. WARDEN et al
RUSSELL TINSLEY |
WARDEN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY |
2:2024cv09673 |
October 2, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Jamel K Semper |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Documents received from Petitioner RUSSEL TINSLEY regarding Business Remit as to the $5.00 Filing Fee. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dam) |
Clerk's Office Docket Annoation: NEF regarding $5.00 Filing Fee paid on 11/4/2024 sent via Regular Mail to Petitioner RUSSEL TINSLEY. (dam) |
Filing fee: $5.00, receipt number NEW51050. (ps) |
Filing 2 ORDER directing the Clerk of the Court to administratively terminate this matter for nonpayment of the filing fee. To reopen this matter, Petitioner shall submit the $5.00 filing fee or alternatively complete and submit the enclosed IFP application within thirty (30) days from the date of entry of this Order. The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order, and an IFP Application, "Affidavit of Poverty and Account Certification (Habeas Corpus)," upon Petitioner by regular U.S. mail. Signed by Judge Jamel K. Semper on 10/28/2024. (Notice of Mail) (dam) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by RUSSEL TINSLEY. No IFP or Filing Fee Received. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Exhibits, #3 Envelope) (mj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.