SHAMUKIGA et al v. MAYORKAS et al
CHRISTOPHE SHAMUKIGA, CLAIRE KAYIRANGWA, CHARLES JUNIOR SHAMUKIGA and CHRIST AUBIN SHAMUKIGA |
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU, MERRICK B. GARLAND and TED H. KIM |
2:2024cv10669 |
November 22, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Michael E Farbiarz |
Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MERRICK B. GARLAND, UR M. JADDOU, TED H. KIM, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS ( Filing and Admin fee $ 405 receipt number ANJDC-15825509), filed by CHARLES JUNIOR SHAMUKIGA, CLAIRE KAYIRANGWA, CHRISTOPHE SHAMUKIGA, CHRIST AUBIN SHAMUKIGA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(FENNY, TAMUNOTONTE) |
Judge Michael E. Farbiarz added. (ps) |
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed did not include a proper Civil Cover Sheet (JS-44), which is required to be submitted along with the initial pleading, as indicated in the Attorney Case Opening Guide. Please complete and file a #Civil Cover Sheet using the event Exhibit (to Document) found under Civil/Other Filings/Other Documents. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (ps) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.