MELENDEZ v. RIGOLLI et al
Plaintiff: EFRAIM MELENDEZ
Defendant: SGT. RIGOLLI, SGT. RAMIREZ, OFFICER MARTIN and SGT. ANDERSON
Case Number: 2:2026cv08310
Filed: July 6, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey
Presiding Judge: Madeline Cox Arleo
Referring Judge: Michael A Hammer
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 27, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 6 TEXT ORDER terminating #5 Motion to Appoint Pro Bono. The Court will take no action on this motion at this time as the Court administratively terminated this matter on August 14, 2026, #4 . SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer on 8/27/26. (tad)
August 27, 2026 Set Deadlines as to #5 MOTION for Pro Bono Counsel. Motion set for 9/21/2026 before Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (N/M) (sks)
August 25, 2026 Filing 5 MOTION for Pro Bono Counsel by EFRAIM MELENDEZ. (sks)
August 14, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER denying #3 Application to Proceed IFP without prejudice. The Clerk shall administratively terminate this case. If Plaintiff wishes to reopen this case, he shall notify the Court in writing within 45 days of this Order and include either a completed IFP application or the $405 fee. Signed by Judge Madeline Cox Arleo on 8/14/2026. (dmr3)
August 14, 2026 ***Civil Case Administratively Terminated. (dmr3)
August 13, 2026 Filing 3 APPLICATION to proceed IN FORMA PAUPERIS by EFRAIM MELENDEZ. (sm)
July 7, 2026 Filing 2 Notice of Guidelines for Appearing Pro Se (N/M)(gev)
July 6, 2026 Filing 1 Complaint Received. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(N/M)(gev)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MELENDEZ v. RIGOLLI et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: EFRAIM MELENDEZ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SGT. RIGOLLI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SGT. RAMIREZ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: OFFICER MARTIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SGT. ANDERSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?