THORNER et al v. SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA LLC et al
CRAIG THORNER and VIRTUAL REALITY FEEDBACK CORPORATION |
SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA INC., SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT INC., GREGORY S. GERWITZ, LERNER DAVID LITTENBERG KRUMHOLZ & MENTLIK, LLP., PERFORMANCE DESIGNED PRODUCTS LLC;, RILEY RUSSELL, LARRY C. RUSS, MARC A. FENSTER and RUSS AUGUST & KABAT |
3:2009cv01894 |
April 21, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Trenton Office |
Ocean |
Douglas E. Arpert |
Garrett E. Brown, Jr. |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 145 Patent Infringement |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 243 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Mary L. Cooper on 8/14/2014. (gxh) |
Filing 237 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Mary L. Cooper on 3/19/2014. (gxh) |
Filing 215 OPINION filed. Signed by Judge Mary L. Cooper on 5/3/2013. (eaj) |
Filing 203 MEMORANDUM OPINION filed. Signed by Judge Mary L. Cooper on 3/18/2013. (mmh) |
Filing 154 OPINION filed. Signed by Chief Judge Garrett E. Brown, Jr. on 9/22/2010. (mmh) |
Filing 114 OPINION filed re 85 MOTION for Sanctions Pursuant to Rule 11 filed by LERNER DAVID LITTENBERG KRUMHOLZ & MENTLIK, LLP., GREGORY S. GEWIRTZ. Signed by Chief Judge Garrett E. Brown, Jr. on 3/9/2010. (mmh) |
Filing 89 OPINION filed re 33 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel filed by SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA INC. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Arpert on 11/20/2009. (mmh) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.