OHAD ASSOCIATES, LLC v. TOWNSHIP OF MARLBORO et al
| OHAD ASSOCIATES, LLC |
| TOWNSHIP OF MARLBORO, THE MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWNSHIP OF MARLBORO and THE TOWNSHIP OF MARLBORO PLANNING BOARD |
| 3:2010cv02183 |
| April 29, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Trenton Office |
| Monmouth |
| Anne E. Thompson |
| Constitutionality of State Statutes |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
OPINION & ORDER granting 18 Motion to Dismiss; that 27 Pltf's request to amend the Complaint is DENIED; closing case. Signed by Judge Anne E. Thompson on 1/28/2011. (gxh)
|
|
Filing
24
OPINION & ORDER granting in part and denying in part 4 Pltf's Motion to Remand; that Counts I and II of Pltf's Complaint are REMANDED to the New Jersey Superior Court, Monmouth County; that this Court retains jurisdiction over Counts III, IV, V, and VI of the Complaint; that jurisdiction over Count VII is remanded insofar as it pertains to certain Counts and is retained insofar as it pertains to certain Counts; terminating as moot 16 Defts Mayor and Town Council of Marlboro's Motion to Dismiss; terminating as moot 17 Deft Township of Marlboro Planning Board's Motion to Dismiss; that briefing on Defts' Motion to Dismiss 18 shall resume. Signed by Judge Anne E. Thompson on 8/16/2010. (gxh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
