POTTER v. FRASER et al
| ERIC POTTER |
| WILLIAM J. FRASER, BAKER, JONES, TEIF, BERRINGER, PIMENTEL, HASSLEBAUER, HISLIP and AWAD |
| 3:2010cv04200 |
| August 16, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Trenton Office |
| Mercer |
| Tonianne J. Bongiovanni |
| Garrett E. Brown |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Joel A. Pisano on 5/3/2012. (gxh)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDERED that the Clk shall reopen the case and shall make a new and separate docket entry reading "CIVIL CASE REOPENED" and ORDERED that pltf's ifp appl as granted and the Clk shall file the Cmp; ORDERED that the federal clms in the Cm p with regard to the loss of personal property, searches, and failure to properly process grievances are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a clm upon which relief may be granted; ORDERED that the federal clms in the cmp regarding conditio ns of confinement, inadequate medical care, access to courts, and retaliation are DISMISSED, without prejudice to the filing of an amended cmp asserting a cognizable clm under 42 U.S.C. 1983, within 30 days of the entry of this Order; ORDERED that the Clk shall make a new and separate docket entry reading "CIVIL CASE TERMINATED". re 4 Opinion. Signed by Chief Judge Garrett E. Brown, Jr on 6/13/11. (dr, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
