MONOSOL RX, LLC v. BIODELIVERY SCIENCES INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
MONOSOL RX, LLC |
BIODELIVERY SCIENCES INTERNATIONAL, INC., MEDA PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and AVEDA DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS, INC. |
3:2010cv05695 |
November 2, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Trenton Office |
Somerset |
Douglas E. Arpert |
Freda L. Wolfson |
Patent |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 Patent Infringement |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 73 OPINION filed. Signed by Judge Freda L. Wolfson on 9/25/2015. (mmh) |
Filing 64 MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER that Defendants' Motion to stay this matter pending the resolution of the USPTO's inter partes reexamination of the '588 patent and ex parte reexamination of the '292 and '891 patents [dkt. entry. no. 60 ] is GRANTED; that defense counsel shall provide the Court with status updates regarding the USPTO's inter partes reexamination of the '588 patent and/or ex parte reexaminations of the '292 and '891 patents every ninety ( 90) days starting May 1, 2012; that defense counsel shall notify the Court within ten (10) days of any disposition of the USPTO's inter partes reexamination of the '588 patent and/or ex parte reexaminations of the '292 and '891 patents; that the Clerk of the Court shall administratively terminate this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Arpert on 3/7/2012. (mmh) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.