KAMIENSKI v. ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
| PAUL KAMIENSKI |
| ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, MARLENE LYNCH FORD, THOMAS F. KELAHER, JAMES W. HOLZAPFEL, RONALD DELIGNY, JOHN MERCUN, SAMUEL J MARZARELLA, E. DAVID MILLARD, JAMES A. CHURCHILL, DANIEL MAHONEY, JEFFREY P. THOMPSON, JOHN DOES 1-10, OCEAN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE and COUNTY OF OCEAN |
| 3:2011cv03056 |
| May 26, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Trenton Office |
| Mercer |
| Douglas E. Arpert |
| Peter G. Sheridan |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
239
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 155 is granted; Plaintiff's Motion to Supplement the Record 224 is denied as moot. Signed by Judge Peter G. Sheridan on 9/17/2019. (jem)
|
|
Filing
109
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 102 Motion to Dismiss; that the period of limited discovery ordered by the Court's September 11, 2012 Order is concluded; that Defendants are required to file an Answer or responsive pleading toKamienski's Amended Complaint within ten (10) days from the entry of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Arpert on 6/9/2015. (mmh)
|
|
Filing
90
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Kamienski's Motion for Reconsideration of the Letter Order [dkt. no. 82 ] is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Arpert on 12/4/2013. (mmh)
|
|
Filing
58
MEMORANDUM & ORDER granting 28 the Motion to Dismiss as to Counts 13 and 14 of the Complaint. Signed by Judge Peter G. Sheridan on 9/13/2012. (eaj)
|
|
Filing
57
MEMORANDUM & ORDER granting in part and denying in part 32 the Ocean County Prosecutors Office (OCPO) and the personally named OCPO defendants motion for summary judgment Motion for Summary Judgment; Dismissing Plaintiff's Section 1983 claims in Count 1, 2 & 3 against the OCPO and the personally named OCPO defendants; further Ordering that the Plaintiff is granted leave to amend his complaint within 30 days; Granting Plaintiff's Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d) application, and the parties are directed to engage in limited discovery as to the immunity defense with respect to plaintiffs Section 1983 claims against the personally named OCPO defendants in their individual capacity; Dismissing Plaintiff's state law claims in Counts 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 against the OCPO defendants. Signed by Judge Peter G. Sheridan on 9/11/2012. (eaj) Modified on 9/12/2012 (eaj, ).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
