CELLCO PARTNERSHIP v. IN TOUCH CONCEPTS, INC.
Plaintiff: CELLCO PARTNERSHIP
Defendant: IN TOUCH CONCEPTS, INC.
Case Number: 3:2011cv06493
Filed: November 4, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Trenton Office
County: Somerset
Presiding Judge: Tonianne J. Bongiovanni
Presiding Judge: Peter G. Sheridan
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 31, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 41 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 14 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Peter G. Sheridan on 5/29/2012. (gxh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CELLCO PARTNERSHIP v. IN TOUCH CONCEPTS, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CELLCO PARTNERSHIP
Represented By: TODD LAWRENCE SCHLEIFSTEIN
Represented By: DAVID JAY
Represented By: PHILIP R. SELLINGER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: IN TOUCH CONCEPTS, INC.
Represented By: MICHAEL W. KENNEDY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?