PROFOOT, INC. v. BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC et al
PROFOOT, INC. |
MSD CONSUMER CARE, INC. and MERCK & CO., INC. |
MSD CONSUMER CARE, INC. |
PROFOOT, INC. |
3:2011cv07079 |
December 5, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Trenton Office |
Hunterdon |
Anne E. Thompson |
Lois H. Goodman |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 330 ORDER regarding discovery dispute and schedule. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lois H. Goodman on 03/24/2017. (Gonzalez, P) |
Filing 302 OPINION. Signed by Judge Anne E. Thompson on 7/21/2016. (gxh) |
Filing 162 MEMORANDUM ORDER Severing Plaintiff's Antitrust Claims from this action; Setting a trial date of 5/10/2016 for Plaintiff's Trademark Claims; Fact Discovery to close on 2/29/2016. Signed by Judge Anne E. Thompson on 12/16/2015. (eaj) |
Filing 132 MEMORANDUM ORDER that the Report and Recommendation is hereby adopted and entered, and the Plaintiff's Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs is GRANTED; that this case is closed. Signed by Judge Anne E. Thompson on 10/24/2014. (jjc) |
Filing 78 ORDER denying 71 Plaintiff ProFoot, Inc.'s Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Anne E. Thompson on 8/20/2012. (eaj) |
Filing 68 OPINION & ORDER denying 42 Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge Anne E. Thompson on 6/14/2012. (eaj) |
Filing 43 OPINION filed. Signed by Judge Anne E. Thompson on 4/11/2012. (eaj) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.