KILMARTIN v. O.C.D.O.C. et al
| STAN J. KILMARTIN |
| O.C.D.O.C., WARDEN HUTLER and O.C. BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS |
| 3:2012cv01080 |
| February 24, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Trenton Office |
| Ocean |
| Lois H. Goodman |
| Peter G. Sheridan |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
2
MEMORANDUM & ORDER Dismissing the Complaint; Ordering the Clerk to terminate all Plaintiffs in this matter except for Leonard P. Sicurella; Administratively terminating this action subject to reopening in the event Leonard P. Sicurella submits, withi n 45 days from the date of entry of this Order, his signed amended complaint asserting his own challenges, togetherwith his filing fee of $350.00 or with his duly executed in forma pauperis application; Ordering the Clerk to open 5 new matters f or the additional Plaintiffs; Ordering the Clerk to terminate these complaints subject to reopening in the event the Plaintiff designated in the matter submits, within 45 days from the date of entry of this Order, his signed amended complaint stating the Plaintiffs individual claims and designating appropriate defendants with regard to those claims together with the filing fee or in forma pauperis application. Signed by Judge Peter G. Sheridan on 2/23/2012. (eaj) Modified on 2/24/2012 (eaj, ).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
