LABOYD v. THE BURLINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY
MARIA LABOYD |
THE BURLINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY |
3:2013cv02414 |
April 15, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Trenton Office |
Mercer |
Douglas E. Arpert |
Michael A. Shipp |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: LABOYD v. THE BURLINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: MARIA LABOYD | |
Represented By: | LAWRENCE E. POPP |
Represented By: | Kenneth W. Thayer |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: THE BURLINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY | |
Represented By: | PAUL F. CLARK |
Represented By: | DENISE FONTANA RICCI |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.